FlowHub
Apache Airflow logo
vs
Conductor logo

Apache Airflow vs Conductor

A side-by-side comparison of Apache Airflow and Conductor across 26 workflow orchestration capabilities. Apache Airflow fully supports 13 of them and Conductor fully supports 20; of the 12 mandatory features, Apache Airflow covers 11 and Conductor covers 11.

Apache Airflow

Apache Airflow is an open-source platform to programmatically author, schedule, and monitor workflows. It allows you to define workflows as code, making them more maintainable, versionable, testable, and collaborative.

Features fully supported13 / 26
Mandatory features: 11 / 12View profile

Conductor

Conductor is an open-source, event-driven workflow orchestration engine originally built at Netflix to orchestrate microservices, now maintained as Conductor OSS for durable application and AI agent workflows.

Features fully supported20 / 26
Mandatory features: 11 / 12View profile

Feature comparison

13 of 26 capabilities differ between Apache Airflow and Conductor.

Change tools
CapabilityApache AirflowConductor
DAG-based workflow definition
Define dependencies and execution order
Mandatory		YesYes
Code-first workflows
Versionable, testable workflows
Mandatory		YesYes
Declarative workflow model
Predictability, reproducibility
Mandatory		YesYes
Task dependency resolution
Correct execution order
Mandatory		YesYes
Persistent workflow state
Crash recovery, observability
Mandatory		YesYes
Task retries
Handle transient failures
Mandatory		YesYes
Retry policies (backoff, limits)
Avoid cascading failures
Recommended		PartialYes
Scheduling (cron / time-based)
Automated recurring workflows
Depends		YesPartial
Event-driven execution
React to external systems
Depends		PartialYes
Backfills / replays
Reprocess historical data
Depends		YesPartial
Idempotency support
Safe retries & replays
Mandatory		YesPartial
Exactly-once semantics
Correctness for business workflows
Optional		NoNo
Long-running workflows (days/months)
Business processes, approvals
Depends		NoYes
Human-in-the-loop steps
Approvals, manual actions
Optional		NoYes
Dynamic workflows at runtime
Conditional execution
Depends		PartialYes
Workflow versioning
Safe evolution over time
Recommended		NoYes
Distributed execution
Scalability
Mandatory		YesYes
High availability scheduler
Production reliability
Recommended		PartialYes
Fault-tolerant execution
Crash safety
Mandatory		PartialYes
Observability (logs, states, UI)
Debugging & ops
Mandatory		YesYes
Workflow-level visibility
Understand end-to-end runs
Mandatory		YesYes
Task isolation
Failure containment
Mandatory		YesYes
Native Kubernetes support
Modern infra compatibility
Depends		PartialPartial
Multi-language SDKs
Polyglot systems
Optional		NoYes
Deterministic replay
Safe recovery & correctness
Optional		NoNo
Pluggable execution backends
Flexibility
Recommended		PartialYes

* To be considered a complete workflow orchestration tool, a tool must implement the features marked as mandatory according to our assessment.

Spotted an inaccuracy? contact@workflows.guru

Learn more

Read the full profiles, including pros and cons, installation and alternatives.

Apache AirflowConductor

Related comparisons