Apache Airflow logo
vs
Dagster logo

Apache Airflow vs Dagster

A side-by-side comparison of Apache Airflow and Dagster across 26 workflow orchestration capabilities. Apache Airflow fully supports 13 of them and Dagster fully supports 12; of the 12 mandatory features, Apache Airflow covers 11 and Dagster covers 10.

Apache Airflow

Apache Airflow is an open-source platform to programmatically author, schedule, and monitor workflows. It allows you to define workflows as code, making them more maintainable, versionable, testable, and collaborative.

Features fully supported13 / 26
Mandatory features: 11 / 12View profile

Dagster

Dagster is an open-source data orchestration platform that helps you build, deploy, and observe data pipelines and data assets.

Features fully supported12 / 26
Mandatory features: 10 / 12View profile

Feature comparison

7 of 26 capabilities differ between Apache Airflow and Dagster.

Change tools
CapabilityApache AirflowDagster
DAG-based workflow definition
Define dependencies and execution order
Mandatory
YesYes
Code-first workflows
Versionable, testable workflows
Mandatory
YesYes
Declarative workflow model
Predictability, reproducibility
Mandatory
YesYes
Task dependency resolution
Correct execution order
Mandatory
YesYes
Persistent workflow state
Crash recovery, observability
Mandatory
YesYes
Task retries
Handle transient failures
Mandatory
YesYes
Retry policies (backoff, limits)
Avoid cascading failures
Recommended
PartialYes
Scheduling (cron / time-based)
Automated recurring workflows
Depends
YesPartial
Event-driven execution
React to external systems
Depends
PartialPartial
Backfills / replays
Reprocess historical data
Depends
YesPartial
Idempotency support
Safe retries & replays
Mandatory
YesPartial
Exactly-once semantics
Correctness for business workflows
Optional
NoYes
Long-running workflows (days/months)
Business processes, approvals
Depends
NoPartial
Human-in-the-loop steps
Approvals, manual actions
Optional
NoNo
Dynamic workflows at runtime
Conditional execution
Depends
PartialPartial
Workflow versioning
Safe evolution over time
Recommended
NoPartial
Distributed execution
Scalability
Mandatory
YesYes
High availability scheduler
Production reliability
Recommended
PartialPartial
Fault-tolerant execution
Crash safety
Mandatory
PartialPartial
Observability (logs, states, UI)
Debugging & ops
Mandatory
YesYes
Workflow-level visibility
Understand end-to-end runs
Mandatory
YesYes
Task isolation
Failure containment
Mandatory
YesYes
Native Kubernetes support
Modern infra compatibility
Depends
PartialPartial
Multi-language SDKs
Polyglot systems
Optional
NoNo
Deterministic replay
Safe recovery & correctness
Optional
NoNo
Pluggable execution backends
Flexibility
Recommended
PartialPartial

* To be considered a complete workflow orchestration tool, a tool must implement the features marked as mandatory according to our assessment.

Spotted an inaccuracy? contact@workflows.guru

Learn more

Read the full profiles, including pros and cons, installation and alternatives.