FlowHub
Inngest logo
vs
ZenML logo

Inngest vs ZenML

A side-by-side comparison of Inngest and ZenML across 26 workflow orchestration capabilities. Inngest fully supports 19 of them and ZenML fully supports 13; of the 12 mandatory features, Inngest covers 10 and ZenML covers 9.

Inngest

Inngest is an event-driven durable execution platform that lets developers write reliable, multi-step background functions and AI workflows in TypeScript, Python or Go, running on serverless, servers or the edge.

Features fully supported19 / 26
Mandatory features: 10 / 12View profile

ZenML

ZenML is an open-source MLOps framework that lets teams write ML and AI pipelines in Python once and run them on any orchestrator and infrastructure stack.

Features fully supported13 / 26
Mandatory features: 9 / 12View profile

Feature comparison

17 of 26 capabilities differ between Inngest and ZenML.

Change tools
CapabilityInngestZenML
DAG-based workflow definition
Define dependencies and execution order
Mandatory		PartialYes
Code-first workflows
Versionable, testable workflows
Mandatory		YesYes
Declarative workflow model
Predictability, reproducibility
Mandatory		NoPartial
Task dependency resolution
Correct execution order
Mandatory		YesYes
Persistent workflow state
Crash recovery, observability
Mandatory		YesYes
Task retries
Handle transient failures
Mandatory		YesYes
Retry policies (backoff, limits)
Avoid cascading failures
Recommended		YesYes
Scheduling (cron / time-based)
Automated recurring workflows
Depends		YesPartial
Event-driven execution
React to external systems
Depends		YesPartial
Backfills / replays
Reprocess historical data
Depends		YesNo
Idempotency support
Safe retries & replays
Mandatory		YesPartial
Exactly-once semantics
Correctness for business workflows
Optional		PartialNo
Long-running workflows (days/months)
Business processes, approvals
Depends		YesPartial
Human-in-the-loop steps
Approvals, manual actions
Optional		YesPartial
Dynamic workflows at runtime
Conditional execution
Depends		YesPartial
Workflow versioning
Safe evolution over time
Recommended		PartialYes
Distributed execution
Scalability
Mandatory		YesYes
High availability scheduler
Production reliability
Recommended		YesPartial
Fault-tolerant execution
Crash safety
Mandatory		YesPartial
Observability (logs, states, UI)
Debugging & ops
Mandatory		YesYes
Workflow-level visibility
Understand end-to-end runs
Mandatory		YesYes
Task isolation
Failure containment
Mandatory		YesYes
Native Kubernetes support
Modern infra compatibility
Depends		PartialYes
Multi-language SDKs
Polyglot systems
Optional		YesNo
Deterministic replay
Safe recovery & correctness
Optional		PartialNo
Pluggable execution backends
Flexibility
Recommended		NoYes

* To be considered a complete workflow orchestration tool, a tool must implement the features marked as mandatory according to our assessment.

Spotted an inaccuracy? contact@workflows.guru

Learn more

Read the full profiles, including pros and cons, installation and alternatives.

InngestZenML

Related comparisons