FlowHub
Cadence logo
vs
Inngest logo

Cadence vs Inngest

A side-by-side comparison of Cadence and Inngest across 26 workflow orchestration capabilities. Cadence fully supports 19 of them and Inngest fully supports 19; of the 12 mandatory features, Cadence covers 9 and Inngest covers 10.

Cadence

Cadence is a durable, fault-tolerant workflow orchestration service for long-running, stateful applications.

Features fully supported19 / 26
Mandatory features: 9 / 12View profile

Inngest

Inngest is an event-driven durable execution platform that lets developers write reliable, multi-step background functions and AI workflows in TypeScript, Python or Go, running on serverless, servers or the edge.

Features fully supported19 / 26
Mandatory features: 10 / 12View profile

Feature comparison

7 of 26 capabilities differ between Cadence and Inngest.

Change tools
CapabilityCadenceInngest
DAG-based workflow definition
Define dependencies and execution order
Mandatory		NoPartial
Code-first workflows
Versionable, testable workflows
Mandatory		YesYes
Declarative workflow model
Predictability, reproducibility
Mandatory		PartialNo
Task dependency resolution
Correct execution order
Mandatory		YesYes
Persistent workflow state
Crash recovery, observability
Mandatory		YesYes
Task retries
Handle transient failures
Mandatory		YesYes
Retry policies (backoff, limits)
Avoid cascading failures
Recommended		YesYes
Scheduling (cron / time-based)
Automated recurring workflows
Depends		PartialYes
Event-driven execution
React to external systems
Depends		YesYes
Backfills / replays
Reprocess historical data
Depends		YesYes
Idempotency support
Safe retries & replays
Mandatory		NoYes
Exactly-once semantics
Correctness for business workflows
Optional		NoPartial
Long-running workflows (days/months)
Business processes, approvals
Depends		YesYes
Human-in-the-loop steps
Approvals, manual actions
Optional		YesYes
Dynamic workflows at runtime
Conditional execution
Depends		YesYes
Workflow versioning
Safe evolution over time
Recommended		YesPartial
Distributed execution
Scalability
Mandatory		YesYes
High availability scheduler
Production reliability
Recommended		YesYes
Fault-tolerant execution
Crash safety
Mandatory		YesYes
Observability (logs, states, UI)
Debugging & ops
Mandatory		YesYes
Workflow-level visibility
Understand end-to-end runs
Mandatory		YesYes
Task isolation
Failure containment
Mandatory		YesYes
Native Kubernetes support
Modern infra compatibility
Depends		PartialPartial
Multi-language SDKs
Polyglot systems
Optional		YesYes
Deterministic replay
Safe recovery & correctness
Optional		YesPartial
Pluggable execution backends
Flexibility
Recommended		NoNo

* To be considered a complete workflow orchestration tool, a tool must implement the features marked as mandatory according to our assessment.

Spotted an inaccuracy? contact@workflows.guru

Learn more

Read the full profiles, including pros and cons, installation and alternatives.

CadenceInngest

Related comparisons