vs
Cadence vs Trigger.dev
A side-by-side comparison of Cadence and Trigger.dev across 26 workflow orchestration capabilities. Cadence fully supports 19 of them and Trigger.dev fully supports 17; of the 12 mandatory features, Cadence covers 9 and Trigger.dev covers 10.
Cadence
Cadence is a durable, fault-tolerant workflow orchestration service for long-running, stateful applications.
Features fully supported19 / 26
Mandatory features: 9 / 12View profile
Trigger.dev
Trigger.dev is an open-source platform for building and running durable background tasks, cron jobs and AI agent workflows in TypeScript, with retries, queues and full observability.
Features fully supported17 / 26
Mandatory features: 10 / 12View profile
Feature comparison
12 of 26 capabilities differ between Cadence and Trigger.dev.
| Capability | Importance* | Cadence | Trigger.dev |
|---|---|---|---|
DAG-based workflow definition Define dependencies and execution order Mandatory | Mandatory | No | Partial |
Code-first workflows Versionable, testable workflows Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Declarative workflow model Predictability, reproducibility Mandatory | Mandatory | Partial | No |
Task dependency resolution Correct execution order Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Persistent workflow state Crash recovery, observability Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Task retries Handle transient failures Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Retry policies (backoff, limits) Avoid cascading failures Recommended | Recommended | Yes | Yes |
Scheduling (cron / time-based) Automated recurring workflows Depends | Depends | Partial | Yes |
Event-driven execution React to external systems Depends | Depends | Yes | Partial |
Backfills / replays Reprocess historical data Depends | Depends | Yes | Partial |
Idempotency support Safe retries & replays Mandatory | Mandatory | No | Yes |
Exactly-once semantics Correctness for business workflows Optional | Optional | No | Partial |
Long-running workflows (days/months) Business processes, approvals Depends | Depends | Yes | Yes |
Human-in-the-loop steps Approvals, manual actions Optional | Optional | Yes | Yes |
Dynamic workflows at runtime Conditional execution Depends | Depends | Yes | Yes |
Workflow versioning Safe evolution over time Recommended | Recommended | Yes | Yes |
Distributed execution Scalability Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
High availability scheduler Production reliability Recommended | Recommended | Yes | Partial |
Fault-tolerant execution Crash safety Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Observability (logs, states, UI) Debugging & ops Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Workflow-level visibility Understand end-to-end runs Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Task isolation Failure containment Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Native Kubernetes support Modern infra compatibility Depends | Depends | Partial | Yes |
Multi-language SDKs Polyglot systems Optional | Optional | Yes | No |
Deterministic replay Safe recovery & correctness Optional | Optional | Yes | No |
Pluggable execution backends Flexibility Recommended | Recommended | No | Partial |
* To be considered a complete workflow orchestration tool, a tool must implement the features marked as mandatory according to our assessment.
Spotted an inaccuracy? contact@workflows.guru
Learn more
Read the full profiles, including pros and cons, installation and alternatives.
Related comparisons
- Cadence vs Airflow
- Trigger.dev vs Airflow
- Cadence vs Prefect
- Trigger.dev vs Prefect
- Cadence vs Dagster
- Trigger.dev vs Dagster
- Cadence vs Argo Workflows
- Trigger.dev vs Argo Workflows
- Cadence vs Temporal
- Trigger.dev vs Temporal
- Cadence vs n8n
- Trigger.dev vs n8n
- Cadence vs Luigi
- Trigger.dev vs Luigi
- Cadence vs Flyte
- Trigger.dev vs Flyte
- Cadence vs CrewAI
- Trigger.dev vs CrewAI
- Cadence vs Kestra
- Trigger.dev vs Kestra
- Cadence vs LangGraph
- Trigger.dev vs LangGraph
- Cadence vs Pipedream
- Trigger.dev vs Pipedream
- Cadence vs Workato
- Trigger.dev vs Workato
- Cadence vs Elsa Workflows
- Trigger.dev vs Elsa Workflows
- Cadence vs Camunda
- Trigger.dev vs Camunda
- Cadence vs Kubeflow Pipelines
- Trigger.dev vs Kubeflow Pipelines
- Cadence vs Metaflow
- Trigger.dev vs Metaflow
- Cadence vs ZenML
- Trigger.dev vs ZenML
- Cadence vs Apache NiFi
- Trigger.dev vs Apache NiFi
- Cadence vs Mage
- Trigger.dev vs Mage
- Cadence vs Tekton
- Trigger.dev vs Tekton
- Cadence vs Conductor
- Trigger.dev vs Conductor
- Cadence vs AWS Step Functions
- Trigger.dev vs AWS Step Functions
- Cadence vs Windmill
- Trigger.dev vs Windmill
- Cadence vs Activepieces
- Trigger.dev vs Activepieces
- Cadence vs Concourse
- Trigger.dev vs Concourse
- Cadence vs Apache DolphinScheduler
- Trigger.dev vs Apache DolphinScheduler
- Cadence vs Inngest
- Trigger.dev vs Inngest
- Cadence vs Restate
- Trigger.dev vs Restate
- Cadence vs Hatchet
- Trigger.dev vs Hatchet