Cadence logo
vs
Restate logo

Cadence vs Restate

A side-by-side comparison of Cadence and Restate across 26 workflow orchestration capabilities. Cadence fully supports 19 of them and Restate fully supports 20; of the 12 mandatory features, Cadence covers 9 and Restate covers 10.

Cadence

Cadence is a durable, fault-tolerant workflow orchestration service for long-running, stateful applications.

Features fully supported19 / 26
Mandatory features: 9 / 12View profile

Restate

Restate is a lightweight durable execution runtime for building resilient services, workflows and AI agents, with SDKs for TypeScript, Java, Kotlin, Python, Go and Rust.

Features fully supported20 / 26
Mandatory features: 10 / 12View profile

Feature comparison

5 of 26 capabilities differ between Cadence and Restate.

Change tools
CapabilityCadenceRestate
DAG-based workflow definition
Define dependencies and execution order
Mandatory
NoNo
Code-first workflows
Versionable, testable workflows
Mandatory
YesYes
Declarative workflow model
Predictability, reproducibility
Mandatory
PartialNo
Task dependency resolution
Correct execution order
Mandatory
YesYes
Persistent workflow state
Crash recovery, observability
Mandatory
YesYes
Task retries
Handle transient failures
Mandatory
YesYes
Retry policies (backoff, limits)
Avoid cascading failures
Recommended
YesYes
Scheduling (cron / time-based)
Automated recurring workflows
Depends
PartialPartial
Event-driven execution
React to external systems
Depends
YesYes
Backfills / replays
Reprocess historical data
Depends
YesNo
Idempotency support
Safe retries & replays
Mandatory
NoYes
Exactly-once semantics
Correctness for business workflows
Optional
NoPartial
Long-running workflows (days/months)
Business processes, approvals
Depends
YesYes
Human-in-the-loop steps
Approvals, manual actions
Optional
YesYes
Dynamic workflows at runtime
Conditional execution
Depends
YesYes
Workflow versioning
Safe evolution over time
Recommended
YesYes
Distributed execution
Scalability
Mandatory
YesYes
High availability scheduler
Production reliability
Recommended
YesYes
Fault-tolerant execution
Crash safety
Mandatory
YesYes
Observability (logs, states, UI)
Debugging & ops
Mandatory
YesYes
Workflow-level visibility
Understand end-to-end runs
Mandatory
YesYes
Task isolation
Failure containment
Mandatory
YesYes
Native Kubernetes support
Modern infra compatibility
Depends
PartialYes
Multi-language SDKs
Polyglot systems
Optional
YesYes
Deterministic replay
Safe recovery & correctness
Optional
YesYes
Pluggable execution backends
Flexibility
Recommended
NoNo

* To be considered a complete workflow orchestration tool, a tool must implement the features marked as mandatory according to our assessment.

Spotted an inaccuracy? contact@workflows.guru

Learn more

Read the full profiles, including pros and cons, installation and alternatives.