FlowHub
Cadence logo
vs
Tekton logo

Cadence vs Tekton

A side-by-side comparison of Cadence and Tekton across 26 workflow orchestration capabilities. Cadence fully supports 19 of them and Tekton fully supports 15; of the 12 mandatory features, Cadence covers 9 and Tekton covers 11.

Cadence

Cadence is a durable, fault-tolerant workflow orchestration service for long-running, stateful applications.

Features fully supported19 / 26
Mandatory features: 9 / 12View profile

Tekton

Tekton is an open-source, Kubernetes-native framework for building CI/CD systems, defining Tasks and Pipelines as Kubernetes custom resources that run each step in a container.

Features fully supported15 / 26
Mandatory features: 11 / 12View profile

Feature comparison

11 of 26 capabilities differ between Cadence and Tekton.

Change tools
CapabilityCadenceTekton
DAG-based workflow definition
Define dependencies and execution order
Mandatory		NoYes
Code-first workflows
Versionable, testable workflows
Mandatory		YesYes
Declarative workflow model
Predictability, reproducibility
Mandatory		PartialYes
Task dependency resolution
Correct execution order
Mandatory		YesYes
Persistent workflow state
Crash recovery, observability
Mandatory		YesYes
Task retries
Handle transient failures
Mandatory		YesYes
Retry policies (backoff, limits)
Avoid cascading failures
Recommended		YesPartial
Scheduling (cron / time-based)
Automated recurring workflows
Depends		PartialPartial
Event-driven execution
React to external systems
Depends		YesYes
Backfills / replays
Reprocess historical data
Depends		YesNo
Idempotency support
Safe retries & replays
Mandatory		NoPartial
Exactly-once semantics
Correctness for business workflows
Optional		NoNo
Long-running workflows (days/months)
Business processes, approvals
Depends		YesNo
Human-in-the-loop steps
Approvals, manual actions
Optional		YesPartial
Dynamic workflows at runtime
Conditional execution
Depends		YesPartial
Workflow versioning
Safe evolution over time
Recommended		YesYes
Distributed execution
Scalability
Mandatory		YesYes
High availability scheduler
Production reliability
Recommended		YesYes
Fault-tolerant execution
Crash safety
Mandatory		YesYes
Observability (logs, states, UI)
Debugging & ops
Mandatory		YesYes
Workflow-level visibility
Understand end-to-end runs
Mandatory		YesYes
Task isolation
Failure containment
Mandatory		YesYes
Native Kubernetes support
Modern infra compatibility
Depends		PartialYes
Multi-language SDKs
Polyglot systems
Optional		YesNo
Deterministic replay
Safe recovery & correctness
Optional		YesNo
Pluggable execution backends
Flexibility
Recommended		NoNo

* To be considered a complete workflow orchestration tool, a tool must implement the features marked as mandatory according to our assessment.

Spotted an inaccuracy? contact@workflows.guru

Learn more

Read the full profiles, including pros and cons, installation and alternatives.

CadenceTekton

Related comparisons