Hatchet vs Trigger.dev
A side-by-side comparison of Hatchet and Trigger.dev across 26 workflow orchestration capabilities. Hatchet fully supports 18 of them and Trigger.dev fully supports 17; of the 12 mandatory features, Hatchet covers 10 and Trigger.dev covers 10.
Hatchet
Hatchet is an open-source, Postgres-based platform for running background tasks, durable workflows and AI agents at scale, with SDKs for Python, TypeScript and Go.
Trigger.dev
Trigger.dev is an open-source platform for building and running durable background tasks, cron jobs and AI agent workflows in TypeScript, with retries, queues and full observability.
Feature comparison
9 of 26 capabilities differ between Hatchet and Trigger.dev.
| Capability | Importance* | Hatchet | Trigger.dev |
|---|---|---|---|
DAG-based workflow definition Define dependencies and execution order Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Partial |
Code-first workflows Versionable, testable workflows Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Declarative workflow model Predictability, reproducibility Mandatory | Mandatory | Partial | No |
Task dependency resolution Correct execution order Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Persistent workflow state Crash recovery, observability Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Task retries Handle transient failures Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Retry policies (backoff, limits) Avoid cascading failures Recommended | Recommended | Yes | Yes |
Scheduling (cron / time-based) Automated recurring workflows Depends | Depends | Yes | Yes |
Event-driven execution React to external systems Depends | Depends | Yes | Partial |
Backfills / replays Reprocess historical data Depends | Depends | Partial | Partial |
Idempotency support Safe retries & replays Mandatory | Mandatory | Partial | Yes |
Exactly-once semantics Correctness for business workflows Optional | Optional | No | Partial |
Long-running workflows (days/months) Business processes, approvals Depends | Depends | Yes | Yes |
Human-in-the-loop steps Approvals, manual actions Optional | Optional | Yes | Yes |
Dynamic workflows at runtime Conditional execution Depends | Depends | Yes | Yes |
Workflow versioning Safe evolution over time Recommended | Recommended | Partial | Yes |
Distributed execution Scalability Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
High availability scheduler Production reliability Recommended | Recommended | Partial | Partial |
Fault-tolerant execution Crash safety Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Observability (logs, states, UI) Debugging & ops Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Workflow-level visibility Understand end-to-end runs Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Task isolation Failure containment Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Native Kubernetes support Modern infra compatibility Depends | Depends | Yes | Yes |
Multi-language SDKs Polyglot systems Optional | Optional | Yes | No |
Deterministic replay Safe recovery & correctness Optional | Optional | Partial | No |
Pluggable execution backends Flexibility Recommended | Recommended | No | Partial |
* To be considered a complete workflow orchestration tool, a tool must implement the features marked as mandatory according to our assessment.
Spotted an inaccuracy? contact@workflows.guru
Learn more
Read the full profiles, including pros and cons, installation and alternatives.
Related comparisons
- Hatchet vs Airflow
- Trigger.dev vs Airflow
- Hatchet vs Prefect
- Trigger.dev vs Prefect
- Hatchet vs Dagster
- Trigger.dev vs Dagster
- Hatchet vs Argo Workflows
- Trigger.dev vs Argo Workflows
- Hatchet vs Temporal
- Trigger.dev vs Temporal
- Hatchet vs n8n
- Trigger.dev vs n8n
- Hatchet vs Luigi
- Trigger.dev vs Luigi
- Hatchet vs Flyte
- Trigger.dev vs Flyte
- Hatchet vs CrewAI
- Trigger.dev vs CrewAI
- Hatchet vs Kestra
- Trigger.dev vs Kestra
- Hatchet vs LangGraph
- Trigger.dev vs LangGraph
- Hatchet vs Pipedream
- Trigger.dev vs Pipedream
- Hatchet vs Workato
- Trigger.dev vs Workato
- Hatchet vs Cadence
- Trigger.dev vs Cadence
- Hatchet vs Elsa Workflows
- Trigger.dev vs Elsa Workflows
- Hatchet vs Camunda
- Trigger.dev vs Camunda
- Hatchet vs Kubeflow Pipelines
- Trigger.dev vs Kubeflow Pipelines
- Hatchet vs Metaflow
- Trigger.dev vs Metaflow
- Hatchet vs ZenML
- Trigger.dev vs ZenML
- Hatchet vs Apache NiFi
- Trigger.dev vs Apache NiFi
- Hatchet vs Mage
- Trigger.dev vs Mage
- Hatchet vs Tekton
- Trigger.dev vs Tekton
- Hatchet vs Conductor
- Trigger.dev vs Conductor
- Hatchet vs AWS Step Functions
- Trigger.dev vs AWS Step Functions
- Hatchet vs Windmill
- Trigger.dev vs Windmill
- Hatchet vs Activepieces
- Trigger.dev vs Activepieces
- Hatchet vs Concourse
- Trigger.dev vs Concourse
- Hatchet vs Apache DolphinScheduler
- Trigger.dev vs Apache DolphinScheduler
- Hatchet vs Inngest
- Trigger.dev vs Inngest
- Hatchet vs Restate
- Trigger.dev vs Restate