vs
Argo Workflows vs Hatchet
A side-by-side comparison of Argo Workflows and Hatchet across 26 workflow orchestration capabilities. Argo Workflows fully supports 20 of them and Hatchet fully supports 18; of the 12 mandatory features, Argo Workflows covers 11 and Hatchet covers 10.
Argo Workflows
Argo Workflows is an open-source, Kubernetes-native container workflow engine for orchestrating parallel jobs and pipelines.
Features fully supported20 / 26
Mandatory features: 11 / 12View profile
Hatchet
Hatchet is an open-source, Postgres-based platform for running background tasks, durable workflows and AI agents at scale, with SDKs for Python, TypeScript and Go.
Features fully supported18 / 26
Mandatory features: 10 / 12View profile
Feature comparison
5 of 26 capabilities differ between Argo Workflows and Hatchet.
| Capability | Importance* | Argo Workflows | Hatchet |
|---|---|---|---|
DAG-based workflow definition Define dependencies and execution order Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Code-first workflows Versionable, testable workflows Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Declarative workflow model Predictability, reproducibility Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Partial |
Task dependency resolution Correct execution order Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Persistent workflow state Crash recovery, observability Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Task retries Handle transient failures Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Retry policies (backoff, limits) Avoid cascading failures Recommended | Recommended | Yes | Yes |
Scheduling (cron / time-based) Automated recurring workflows Depends | Depends | Yes | Yes |
Event-driven execution React to external systems Depends | Depends | Yes | Yes |
Backfills / replays Reprocess historical data Depends | Depends | Partial | Partial |
Idempotency support Safe retries & replays Mandatory | Mandatory | Partial | Partial |
Exactly-once semantics Correctness for business workflows Optional | Optional | No | No |
Long-running workflows (days/months) Business processes, approvals Depends | Depends | Yes | Yes |
Human-in-the-loop steps Approvals, manual actions Optional | Optional | Yes | Yes |
Dynamic workflows at runtime Conditional execution Depends | Depends | Yes | Yes |
Workflow versioning Safe evolution over time Recommended | Recommended | Yes | Partial |
Distributed execution Scalability Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
High availability scheduler Production reliability Recommended | Recommended | Yes | Partial |
Fault-tolerant execution Crash safety Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Observability (logs, states, UI) Debugging & ops Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Workflow-level visibility Understand end-to-end runs Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Task isolation Failure containment Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Native Kubernetes support Modern infra compatibility Depends | Depends | Yes | Yes |
Multi-language SDKs Polyglot systems Optional | Optional | No | Yes |
Deterministic replay Safe recovery & correctness Optional | Optional | No | Partial |
Pluggable execution backends Flexibility Recommended | Recommended | No | No |
* To be considered a complete workflow orchestration tool, a tool must implement the features marked as mandatory according to our assessment.
Spotted an inaccuracy? contact@workflows.guru
Learn more
Read the full profiles, including pros and cons, installation and alternatives.
Related comparisons
- Argo Workflows vs Airflow
- Hatchet vs Airflow
- Argo Workflows vs Prefect
- Hatchet vs Prefect
- Argo Workflows vs Dagster
- Hatchet vs Dagster
- Argo Workflows vs Temporal
- Hatchet vs Temporal
- Argo Workflows vs n8n
- Hatchet vs n8n
- Argo Workflows vs Luigi
- Hatchet vs Luigi
- Argo Workflows vs Flyte
- Hatchet vs Flyte
- Argo Workflows vs CrewAI
- Hatchet vs CrewAI
- Argo Workflows vs Kestra
- Hatchet vs Kestra
- Argo Workflows vs LangGraph
- Hatchet vs LangGraph
- Argo Workflows vs Pipedream
- Hatchet vs Pipedream
- Argo Workflows vs Workato
- Hatchet vs Workato
- Argo Workflows vs Cadence
- Hatchet vs Cadence
- Argo Workflows vs Elsa Workflows
- Hatchet vs Elsa Workflows
- Argo Workflows vs Camunda
- Hatchet vs Camunda
- Argo Workflows vs Kubeflow Pipelines
- Hatchet vs Kubeflow Pipelines
- Argo Workflows vs Metaflow
- Hatchet vs Metaflow
- Argo Workflows vs ZenML
- Hatchet vs ZenML
- Argo Workflows vs Apache NiFi
- Hatchet vs Apache NiFi
- Argo Workflows vs Mage
- Hatchet vs Mage
- Argo Workflows vs Tekton
- Hatchet vs Tekton
- Argo Workflows vs Conductor
- Hatchet vs Conductor
- Argo Workflows vs AWS Step Functions
- Hatchet vs AWS Step Functions
- Argo Workflows vs Windmill
- Hatchet vs Windmill
- Argo Workflows vs Activepieces
- Hatchet vs Activepieces
- Argo Workflows vs Concourse
- Hatchet vs Concourse
- Argo Workflows vs Apache DolphinScheduler
- Hatchet vs Apache DolphinScheduler
- Argo Workflows vs Inngest
- Hatchet vs Inngest
- Argo Workflows vs Restate
- Hatchet vs Restate
- Argo Workflows vs Trigger.dev
- Hatchet vs Trigger.dev