Apache NiFi logo
vs
Hatchet logo

Apache NiFi vs Hatchet

A side-by-side comparison of Apache NiFi and Hatchet across 26 workflow orchestration capabilities. Apache NiFi fully supports 12 of them and Hatchet fully supports 18; of the 12 mandatory features, Apache NiFi covers 7 and Hatchet covers 10.

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi is an open-source dataflow platform for routing, transforming and moving data between systems, designed visually in a web-based UI with guaranteed delivery and data provenance.

Features fully supported12 / 26
Mandatory features: 7 / 12View profile

Hatchet

Hatchet is an open-source, Postgres-based platform for running background tasks, durable workflows and AI agents at scale, with SDKs for Python, TypeScript and Go.

Features fully supported18 / 26
Mandatory features: 10 / 12View profile

Feature comparison

11 of 26 capabilities differ between Apache NiFi and Hatchet.

Change tools
CapabilityApache NiFiHatchet
DAG-based workflow definition
Define dependencies and execution order
Mandatory
PartialYes
Code-first workflows
Versionable, testable workflows
Mandatory
NoYes
Declarative workflow model
Predictability, reproducibility
Mandatory
PartialPartial
Task dependency resolution
Correct execution order
Mandatory
YesYes
Persistent workflow state
Crash recovery, observability
Mandatory
YesYes
Task retries
Handle transient failures
Mandatory
YesYes
Retry policies (backoff, limits)
Avoid cascading failures
Recommended
YesYes
Scheduling (cron / time-based)
Automated recurring workflows
Depends
YesYes
Event-driven execution
React to external systems
Depends
YesYes
Backfills / replays
Reprocess historical data
Depends
PartialPartial
Idempotency support
Safe retries & replays
Mandatory
PartialPartial
Exactly-once semantics
Correctness for business workflows
Optional
NoNo
Long-running workflows (days/months)
Business processes, approvals
Depends
PartialYes
Human-in-the-loop steps
Approvals, manual actions
Optional
NoYes
Dynamic workflows at runtime
Conditional execution
Depends
PartialYes
Workflow versioning
Safe evolution over time
Recommended
YesPartial
Distributed execution
Scalability
Mandatory
YesYes
High availability scheduler
Production reliability
Recommended
YesPartial
Fault-tolerant execution
Crash safety
Mandatory
YesYes
Observability (logs, states, UI)
Debugging & ops
Mandatory
YesYes
Workflow-level visibility
Understand end-to-end runs
Mandatory
YesYes
Task isolation
Failure containment
Mandatory
PartialYes
Native Kubernetes support
Modern infra compatibility
Depends
PartialYes
Multi-language SDKs
Polyglot systems
Optional
PartialYes
Deterministic replay
Safe recovery & correctness
Optional
NoPartial
Pluggable execution backends
Flexibility
Recommended
NoNo

* To be considered a complete workflow orchestration tool, a tool must implement the features marked as mandatory according to our assessment.

Spotted an inaccuracy? contact@workflows.guru

Learn more

Read the full profiles, including pros and cons, installation and alternatives.