

Hatchet vs Inngest
A side-by-side comparison of Hatchet and Inngest across 26 workflow orchestration capabilities. Hatchet fully supports 18 of them and Inngest fully supports 19; of the 12 mandatory features, Hatchet covers 10 and Inngest covers 10.
Hatchet
Hatchet is an open-source, Postgres-based platform for running background tasks, durable workflows and AI agents at scale, with SDKs for Python, TypeScript and Go.
Inngest
Inngest is an event-driven durable execution platform that lets developers write reliable, multi-step background functions and AI workflows in TypeScript, Python or Go, running on serverless, servers or the edge.
Feature comparison
7 of 26 capabilities differ between Hatchet and Inngest.
| Capability | Importance* | ||
|---|---|---|---|
DAG-based workflow definition Define dependencies and execution order Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Partial |
Code-first workflows Versionable, testable workflows Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Declarative workflow model Predictability, reproducibility Mandatory | Mandatory | Partial | No |
Task dependency resolution Correct execution order Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Persistent workflow state Crash recovery, observability Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Task retries Handle transient failures Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Retry policies (backoff, limits) Avoid cascading failures Recommended | Recommended | Yes | Yes |
Scheduling (cron / time-based) Automated recurring workflows Depends | Depends | Yes | Yes |
Event-driven execution React to external systems Depends | Depends | Yes | Yes |
Backfills / replays Reprocess historical data Depends | Depends | Partial | Yes |
Idempotency support Safe retries & replays Mandatory | Mandatory | Partial | Yes |
Exactly-once semantics Correctness for business workflows Optional | Optional | No | Partial |
Long-running workflows (days/months) Business processes, approvals Depends | Depends | Yes | Yes |
Human-in-the-loop steps Approvals, manual actions Optional | Optional | Yes | Yes |
Dynamic workflows at runtime Conditional execution Depends | Depends | Yes | Yes |
Workflow versioning Safe evolution over time Recommended | Recommended | Partial | Partial |
Distributed execution Scalability Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
High availability scheduler Production reliability Recommended | Recommended | Partial | Yes |
Fault-tolerant execution Crash safety Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Observability (logs, states, UI) Debugging & ops Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Workflow-level visibility Understand end-to-end runs Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Task isolation Failure containment Mandatory | Mandatory | Yes | Yes |
Native Kubernetes support Modern infra compatibility Depends | Depends | Yes | Partial |
Multi-language SDKs Polyglot systems Optional | Optional | Yes | Yes |
Deterministic replay Safe recovery & correctness Optional | Optional | Partial | Partial |
Pluggable execution backends Flexibility Recommended | Recommended | No | No |
* To be considered a complete workflow orchestration tool, a tool must implement the features marked as mandatory according to our assessment.
Spotted an inaccuracy? contact@workflows.guru
Learn more
Read the full profiles, including pros and cons, installation and alternatives.
Related comparisons
- Hatchet vs Airflow
- Inngest vs Airflow
- Hatchet vs Prefect
- Inngest vs Prefect
- Hatchet vs Dagster
- Inngest vs Dagster
- Hatchet vs Argo Workflows
- Inngest vs Argo Workflows
- Hatchet vs Temporal
- Inngest vs Temporal
- Hatchet vs n8n
- Inngest vs n8n
- Hatchet vs Luigi
- Inngest vs Luigi
- Hatchet vs Flyte
- Inngest vs Flyte
- Hatchet vs CrewAI
- Inngest vs CrewAI
- Hatchet vs Kestra
- Inngest vs Kestra
- Hatchet vs LangGraph
- Inngest vs LangGraph
- Hatchet vs Pipedream
- Inngest vs Pipedream
- Hatchet vs Workato
- Inngest vs Workato
- Hatchet vs Cadence
- Inngest vs Cadence
- Hatchet vs Elsa Workflows
- Inngest vs Elsa Workflows
- Hatchet vs Camunda
- Inngest vs Camunda
- Hatchet vs Kubeflow Pipelines
- Inngest vs Kubeflow Pipelines
- Hatchet vs Metaflow
- Inngest vs Metaflow
- Hatchet vs ZenML
- Inngest vs ZenML
- Hatchet vs Apache NiFi
- Inngest vs Apache NiFi
- Hatchet vs Mage
- Inngest vs Mage
- Hatchet vs Tekton
- Inngest vs Tekton
- Hatchet vs Conductor
- Inngest vs Conductor
- Hatchet vs AWS Step Functions
- Inngest vs AWS Step Functions
- Hatchet vs Windmill
- Inngest vs Windmill
- Hatchet vs Activepieces
- Inngest vs Activepieces
- Hatchet vs Concourse
- Inngest vs Concourse
- Hatchet vs Apache DolphinScheduler
- Inngest vs Apache DolphinScheduler
- Hatchet vs Restate
- Inngest vs Restate
- Hatchet vs Trigger.dev
- Inngest vs Trigger.dev